From: prenom_nomus@yahoo.com   
      
   On Sep 10, 12:22 am, Chris Hills  wrote:   
   > The MISRA-C team has to make a decision: should it move from   
   > Referencing C95 (9899:1990+A1+RC1+TC2) to referencing C99 for the next   
   > MISRA-C (version 3)   
   >   
   > In the real world (especially embedded, safety-critical and   
   > high-integrity circles) there are no C99 compilers in use as of   
   > September 2007.  They are C95+.   
   >   
   > Any thoughts from anyone involved in writing compilers? Either to the   
   > NG or to my email address.  Yes, I have asked most of the main   
   > embedded compiler companies I have contacts for (about 15 of them so   
   > far) .   
      
     How would this affect current or future rules?   
     Could both be referenced ?   
      
      Almost all current C compilers have at least some C99 in them   
   like // comments.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)