Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,105 of 2,753    |
|    glen herrmannsfeldt to wenhelt@free.fr    |
|    Re: Compilers for supercomputing or the     |
|    06 Oct 07 00:09:22    |
      From: gah@ugcs.caltech.edu              wenhelt@free.fr wrote:              > Although compiler code for supercomputing is commonplace,       > supercomputing FOR compilers is coming.              > For an EDA (Electronic Design Automation) project, we are facing       > symbol tables over 500 million entries.              I believe one of the traditional reasons for separate compilation of       subroutines and linking is that it reduces the number of symbols that       you have to keep track of at one time. Only one routine worth of       internal symbols for the compiler. All the external symbols for the       linker. Do you mean 5e8 symbols for one subroutine?              -- glen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca