Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,178 of 2,753    |
|    Srinu to All    |
|    Transition diagram as a plan for recursi    |
|    11 Dec 07 02:04:47    |
      From: sinu.nayak2001@gmail.com              Hi All,              While going through the book, "Principles of compiler Design", I found       the following information in the article discussing about "Transition       diagram as a plan for recursive-descent parsers".              There we said that, If we get a non deterministic transition diagram       from the grammar, it is not possible to construct the deterministic       equivalent of it. The reason is, we can't just follow the subset-       construction method that is applied to make an NFA to DFA, because it       can't remember how many recursive calls are made.              I couldn't understand this fully. Do we need to remember anything such       while we go for subset-construction method ? Please help me       understanding this.              Srinu              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca