From: Jan.Vorbrueggen@thomson.net   
      
   Didn't see the original reply, but...:   
   >> In fact, most compiler/frameworks support function-inlining which   
   >> may lead to even bigger functions, which again may lead to a cache   
   >> being to small to hold more than just one function, in such cases   
   >> such a reordering does not make much sense.   
      
   But remember that most current processors have more than one level of   
   cache. I doubt there are many, if any, functions in existence that would   
   exceed the capacity of, say, the Montecito L3 cache (16 MB or so).   
      
   	Jan   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)