home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.compilers      Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod      2,753 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,266 of 2,753   
   Hans Aberg to Jon Forrest   
   Re: Is There Still a Need for "Turbo" Co   
   18 Mar 08 10:47:05   
   
   From: haberg_20080313@math.su.se   
      
   Jon Forrest wrote:   
      
   > Is this because modern hardware is so fast that it   
   > isn't worth developing compilers and linkers optimized for speed?   
      
   The Mac OS X development package Xcode has, for the development phase, a   
   "zero-link" feature - the code is not linked at all, except at need at   
   runtime.   
      
   > By using proper command line arguments to gcc, can you get   
   > quasi-Turbo performance compared to using arguments that result in   
   > highly-optimized code?   
      
   When developing in Haskell, one can use the interpreter Hugs, or GHCi,   
   and then make binaries using the compiler GHC. The programs runhugs and   
   runhaskell can interpret Haskell scripts.   
      
      Hans Aberg   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca