From: max@gustavus.edu   
      
   This is a correction to my own earlier post.  I accidentally missed a   
   "not" in the following:   
      
   > ... then the simplest   
   > solution would be to treat procedure calls as block boundaries.  The   
   > blocks won't be basic blocks any more -- but they probably will be   
   > what you want.   
      
   I meant to suggest *not* treating procedure calls as block   
   boundaries.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)