On 15 Jun., 06:59, Richard Pennington  wrote:   
      
   > I'm having a hard time understanding why LLVM doesn't work for you. It   
   > can look like a traditional code generator back end but you can also   
   > JIT compile the LLVM bitcode, rather than generating assembly language   
   > and linking it.   
      
   Well i have to say that it is really heavy. And i don't need a lot of   
   optimizations and features they offer, because for the optimized final   
   call i will write pure C anyway.   
      
   And more important for my feeling of not useing LLVM is that Windows   
   seems to have no high priority for the developers. None of the latest   
   releases compiles 100% without errors. 2.2 didn't compile at all.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)