Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,388 of 2,753    |
|    Paul B Mann to All    |
|    Re: Intricate problem with scannerless L    |
|    26 Jun 08 23:14:08    |
      From: paul@paulbmann.com              >>>start: a       >>>a: b 'XX'       >>>b: c | '[' b ']'       >>>c: 'X' | c 'X'       >       >> XX is valid, but ambiguous, either a keyword or two X's.              > Are you sure it is ambiguous? Maybe it isn't LALR(1), though.       > Since there is no a in b or c, it looks to me that it only matches       > strings ending in 'XX'. If b is 'XX' then it still must be followed       > by another 'XX'.              You are right. I was wrong.              X XX is valid       XX XX is valid       XXX XX is valid.              The parser needs 2 characters of lookahead to correctly       parse this language, depending on how spaces are processed.                     Paul B Mann              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca