Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,461 of 2,753    |
|    Aaron Gray to ajk    |
|    Re: .NET compiler    |
|    18 Sep 08 21:42:35    |
   
   From: ang.usenet@gmail.com   
      
   "ajk" wrote in message news:08-09-070@comp.compilers...   
   > If I was contemplating doing a .NET compiler for a language, would it   
   > be better to generate ILAsm or some other higher-level .NET language?   
   >   
   > By creating ILAsm there is more control but I suppose one would have   
   > to put more effort in optimisation. Round-tripping would also work.   
   > Any other benefits of doing ILAsm compared to say C# and then   
   > compiling C# using the std compiler?   
      
   If your language is dynamic you may well want to consder the DLR as   
   developed with Iron Ruby and Iron Python.   
      
   Aaron   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca