Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,547 of 2,753    |
|    Gavin Scott to Ray Dillinger    |
|    Re: New assembly language instructions t    |
|    16 Dec 08 19:44:11    |
   
   XPost: comp.arch   
   From: gavin@allegro.com   
      
   In comp.arch Ray Dillinger wrote:   
   > If I had my druthers, I'd add a number of VERY wide registers   
   > replacing on the chip die the "implicit" registers known as cache   
   > lines and make the management of these explicit with its own   
   > instructions rather than implicit and heuristic.   
      
   How many of such registers would you want? Making them explicitly   
   visible registers bulks up your context switch saved-state.   
      
   Or is there an opportunity to re-introduce instructions that operate   
   directly on memory and support large data types / SIMD that happen to   
   execute extremely efficiently if the operands match cache line   
   size and alignment?   
      
   G.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca