Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,571 of 2,753    |
|    Mike Burrell to marco.m.petersen@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Is Assembler Language essential in c    |
|    10 Feb 09 10:15:00    |
      From: mburrel@uwo.ca              On 2009-02-09 05:34:36 -0500, marco.m.petersen@gmail.com said:              > I mean, if you wrote a program that converts code from BASIC to C++       > then calls another compiler to do the compilation process, wouldn't       > that be considered as a compiler?              It depends on what you want to get out of your compiler. A lot of       compilers, especially when they're in the proof-of-concept stage, will       target another language, such as C. If your primary goal in writing       the compiler isn't to worry about the back-end stuff (register       allocation and all those fun things), then it's easier to just target       C, and you get portability to boot.              You will be limited in what you can do if you aren't familiar with       assembly, though.              Cheers,       Mike              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca