Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,577 of 2,753    |
|    Louis Krupp to Tony    |
|    Re: Internal Representation of Strings    |
|    14 Feb 09 19:41:20    |
      From: lkrupp@pssw.nospam.com.invalid              Tony wrote:       > What are some good ways/concepts of internal string representation?       > Are/should string literals, fixed-length strings and dynamic-lenght strings       > handled differently? My first tendency is to avoid like the plague       > NUL-terminated strings (aka, C strings) and to opt for some kind of array       > with a length at the beginning followed by the characters that could be       > encapsulated at the library level with appropriate functions. But just a       > length seems like not enough information: the capacity (array length) also       > would be nice to have around. All thoughts, old and novel, welcome.              You might be able to use the VMS descriptor for inspiration. Google for       "descrip.h," "OpenVMS descriptor," etc.              Louis              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca