On Mar 16, 1:34 am, Max Hailperin  wrote:   
      
   > How about ...   
      
   I'm now using a similar solution. The drawback of yours is that I'd   
   need another detail struct-type to transport the tail-data. On the   
   other hand, it does have less duplication than mine.   
      
   Perhaps I can use precedence declarations instead. I just learned how   
   from John. Apparently they can be used to solve arbitrary shift/reduce   
   conflicts. It might be the best of both worlds.   
      
   Thanks,   
      
   --   
   Michiel Helvensteijn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)