Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,617 of 2,753    |
|    russell kym horsell to All    |
|    Re: Algol W    |
|    31 Mar 09 04:03:50    |
   
   From: kym@svalbard.freeshell.org   
      
   Tomasz Kowaltowski wrote:   
   } compilers-owner@lists.iecc.com wrote:   
   } > [Algol W was somewhere between Algol 60 and Pascal, with records and   
   } > defined I/O, and no call by name. It was different enough from its   
   } > predecessors to be called a language. -John]   
   } I have the impression that Algol W was designed so that it could be   
   } parsed using simple precedence grammars defined by Wirth and Weber as a   
   } generalization of operator precedence grammars.   
      
   In the 70s there was an implementation in META2 for the DECsystem10.   
   Boy, was META2 a can of worms. :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca