Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,636 of 2,753    |
|    Quinn Tyler Jackson to Jeremy J Starcher    |
|    RE: compiler bugs    |
|    28 Apr 09 12:57:33    |
      From: quinn_jackson2004@yahoo.ca              Jeremy J Starcher said:              > That said, when I come across a problem, I always assume the bug is in my       > code until I can provide a test case that clearly demonstrates that the       > compiler itself is at fault.              I can count on one hand the number of genuine compiler bugs I've been able       to isolate and reproduce well enough to report as official bugs. (Even the       so-called optimization bugs turned out to be my violation of some contract       with the compiler, such as aliasing when I oughtn't have.)              That said, I couldn't count in all the bits of a gigabyte how many times       I've heard programmers (including myself) say: "The *($@&&^ compiler is       buggy!"                            --       Quinn Tyler Jackson              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca