Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,666 of 2,753    |
|    George Neuner to gneuner2@comcast.net    |
|    Re: behavior-preserving optimization in     |
|    24 May 09 04:55:55    |
      [continued from previous message]              executable. When both definitions were weak, however, some of the       compilers produced optimized executables with NO storage at all       allocated for the name 'x'.              I know this isn't a C forum and nobody (including me) cares much to       debate what is right or wrong about C. But for the sake of a       discussion about compilers, how would you handle the situation if it       were up to you?              George              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca