From: sinu.nayak2001@gmail.com   
      
   On Sep 18, 11:17 pm, an...@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)   
   wrote:   
   > That's just a question of what you see as syntax and what as "static   
   > semantics".  The current mainstream is to consider things described by   
   > a context-free grammar as syntax and anything beyond that that has to   
   > be statically checked as static semantics.   
      
   I agree to this.   
      
   So, basically the answer is, "it is possible".   
      
   Thanks a lot.   
      
   Srinu   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)