Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,903 of 2,753    |
|    chris dollin to glen herrmannsfeldt    |
|    re: Compiler or interpreter?    |
|    18 Jun 10 08:15:44    |
      From: ehog.hedge@googlemail.com              glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:              > So where do you draw a line between "true compiler" and "just an       > interpreter?"              There is no line.              There is more-compilery and more-interpretery, and they're more or       less inverses, but there's no objective distinction with all the       compilery things on one side and all the interpretery things on the       other.              It's my feeling that arguments about where that line is are concealing       more interesting arguments about the details. It's the kind of       question that makes me ask, "if you had the answer, what would you do       with it?"              If you knew where the line between "true compiler" and "an       interpreter" ["just" is pejorative] was, what would you do       differently?       --       Chris "allusive" Dollin              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca