From: noitalmost@cox.net   
      
   I've noticed that Wirth has continually rejected the idea of a break   
   statement and I was wonder why. Is this purely philosophical, or are   
   there code optimization reasons? Naive code for a break is trivial to   
   implement.   
      
   Is it easier to optimize loops with no break? That is, is the cost of   
   having extra booleans to control the loop less than the cost of   
   messing up the basic blocks with break?   
   [It's a little easy to optimize single-exit loops, but my impression is   
   that the motivation was more like salvation through suffering. -John]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)