Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,046 of 2,753    |
|    Armel to All    |
|    Re: coupling LALR with a scanner?    |
|    07 Jul 11 10:28:46    |
      From: armelasselin@hotmail.com              >[The usual approach is to set flex start states in your yacc or bison       >parser. >-John]              the LALR generator is one of mine and the idea here would be to select       automatically the right lexer from the currently accepted tokens. I have the       feeling that it must be doable. The target is to be able to write grammars       with such dependencies naturally without any (user level) grammar actions       and very minimal lexer meta-information (such as which lexer produces which       tokens).              Armel       [I think you will find that users hate a compiler where in each state the       lexer only recognizes the tokens valid in that state, since the only error       message it could produce is "invalid token." Also remember that the LA in       LALR stands for Look Ahead, and the lexer is often one token ahead of the       parser. -John]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca