From: jgk@panix.com   
      
   Anton Ertl  wrote:   
   >a<3 AND b<3   
      
   This reminds me of a question.   
      
   One person designs a language 'C1' with precedence:   
      
       [higher]   
       ...   
       |   
       &   
       <, <=, >, <=   
       ==, !=   
       ...   
       [lower]   
      
   Some other person designs a language 'C2' with precedence:   
      
       [higher]   
       ...   
       <, <=, >, <=   
       ==, !=   
       |   
       &   
       ...   
       [lower]   
      
   They're the same besides that.   
      
   To compromise, they make a new language 'C3' such that a program is   
   valid C3 if it is valid C1 and valid C2 -and- both ways mean the same.   
      
   Is there some good way to do this -in the grammar-?   
      
   [I see gcc has warnings like this.]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)