Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,226 of 2,753    |
|    Florian Weimer to All    |
|    SSA conversion and closure conversion    |
|    01 Jul 13 21:36:26    |
      From: fw@deneb.enyo.de              I'm trying to implement some program analysis (exact goals are still a       bit foggy) for a programming language which has mutable local       variables and closures. I want to convert things to SSA form because       I'm mostly interested in properties which could be easily extracted in       that representation, I think. I see three ways to deal with       closed-over variables: perform closure conversion first (and something       like scalar replacement later, to recover information on closed-over       variables), perform SSA conversion and insert phi nodes after       instructions which potentially call a closure, or somehow combine       closure conversion and SSA conversion.              Surely this has come up before, and I'm wondering which option is best       or if I'm missing some approach.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca