Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,293 of 2,753    |
|    George Neuner to Clodius    |
|    Re: LR(1) Parsing : Error Handling & Rec    |
|    20 Jul 14 01:19:09    |
      From: gneuner2@comcast.net              On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:41:53 -0600, wclodius@earthlink.net (William       Clodius) wrote:              >I have memories that an LR(k) grammar can in principle be refactored       >to LR(1), but that in general an LL(k) grammar cannot be refactored to       >LL(1).              LL(k) always can be refactored to single token lookahead, but it       causes an explosion of grammar states. E.g., given a single LL(3)       rule, an equivalent set of LL(1) rules must match every valid       combination of tokens at +1, +2 and +3.              George              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca