Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,467 of 2,753    |
|    Gene Wirchenko to Our Esteemed Moderator    |
|    Re: language design after Algol 60    |
|    18 Apr 18 16:12:10    |
      From: genew@telus.net              On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 19:08:57 +1000, Our Esteemed Moderator wrote:              [snip]              >[BTW, the current specification of Fortran is longer than that of PL/I.]       >       >[Perhaps he meant that it was impossible for *him* to master the language.       >It does have some odd rough edges, e.g., give or take my recollection of       >the syntax:       >       > DCL (A,B,C) CHAR(3);       > A = '123';       > B = '456';       > C = A+B;       >       >What does C contain? Answer: three spaces. -John]               There was an even weirder PL/I one that I tried to find but can       not. As I recall, it was five implicit conversions that ended up with       a value opposite to the starting value.              Sincerely,              Gene Wirchenko              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca