Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,470 of 2,753    |
|    Richard to rockbrentwood@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Compiler implementation language pre    |
|    10 Nov 18 15:06:29    |
      From: portempa@aon.at              On 09.11.18 23:29, rockbrentwood@gmail.com wrote:              > A test of whether the language, itself, is worth using -- assuming it is a       > general purpose language -- is whether you'd be willing to write the       compiler,       > itself, in it!              This does not prove anything about applicability of the language for       anything other than writing a similar compiler.              Richard       [Good point. Compilers use a variety of data structures and recursive       algorithms       so if you can write a compiler, it's likely an adequate systems language. On       the other hand, IBM Fortran H was written in itself which only made sense       because       the alternative was assembler. -John]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca