Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,481 of 2,753    |
|    Philipp Klaus Krause to All    |
|    Re: Why do some versions of bison requir    |
|    03 Jan 19 09:15:25    |
   
   From: pkk@spth.de   
      
   Am 01.01.19 um 10:55 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause:   
   > [Adding the empty action forces bison to reduce the rule rather than just   
   > shifting and saving state for later. I couldn't guess why that would matter   
   > in this case. Are there precedence rules? With your change does the   
   grammar compile   
   > cleanly or does it have conflicts? -John]   
   >   
      
   Well, for me (but I don't see the problem without the {} on my system -   
   GNU bison 3.2.2 on Debian GNU/Linux), both with and without {}, when using   
   LANG=C bison -W -y -d SDCC.y   
   I get 7 warning about "empty rule without %empty", but no other   
   warnings. The people reporting issues seem to be using GNU bison on   
   Microsoft Windows.   
      
   Philipp   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca