Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,489 of 2,753    |
|    Hans-Peter Diettrich to All    |
|    Re: Best language for implementing compi    |
|    09 Mar 19 10:14:01    |
      From: DrDiettrich1@netscape.net              Am 09.03.2019 um 07:47 schrieb mertesthomas@gmail.com:              > For parsing I don't think that pattern matching leads to correct       > results in all cases. I have seen too much buggy attempts to do       > parsing with pattern matching. Even for such simple things as       > lines with key=value I saw "solutions" with pattern matching, that       > triggered bugs when the line was not simple. A good approach for       > parsing is LL(1), which has nothing to do with pattern matching.              IMO bottom-up parsers (LR) do pattern matching, in contrast to top-down       parsers (LL). Where bottom-up parsers can suffer from shift/reduce       conflicts.              DoDi              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca