Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,592 of 2,753    |
|    Hans-Peter Diettrich to Kaz Kylheku    |
|    Re: Are transpiling techniques different    |
|    16 Oct 21 23:55:12    |
      From: DrDiettrich1@netscape.net              On 10/16/21 7:16 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:              > "To compile" is an attractive word in that it means putting stuff       > together              The same applies to "assemble" at machine level.              I could imagine that at that time the result was more important than       sophisticated handling of source code. A portable C compiler also is       assumed to output executable modules where other compilers rely on a linker.              DoDi       [The Bell Labs portable C compiler output assembler source code, although       most people didn't notice since it normally assembled it and threw the       assembler code away. Last time I checked gcc and clang do the same. -John]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca