Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,656 of 2,753    |
|    Hans-Peter Diettrich to Christopher F Clark    |
|    Re: Implementing built-in functions with    |
|    07 Oct 22 20:59:49    |
      From: DrDiettrich1@netscape.net              On 10/7/22 7:56 AM, Christopher F Clark wrote:              > Still, the ability to call functions is the key thing you need to do.              And the compiler has to decide whether an argument type is okay, can be       converted, or is incompatible with a function definition. So IMO       handling of polymorphic and variadic functions is a matter of       organisation of function argument types.              DoDi              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca