Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,710 of 2,753    |
|    gah4 to All    |
|    Which comes first, languages or compiler    |
|    25 Oct 23 12:39:24    |
      From: gah4@u.washington.edu              Not from a Quora question, but one did remind me.              Which (well known) languages were mostly defined before the first       compiler was written? (Not counting the one you did for a homework       assignment.)              As well as I know it, and similar to the way IBM defined the S/360       architecture before five different groups started implementing it,       PL/I (nee NPL) was pretty much completely described before groups       started implementing it. There is a published IBM manual with that       description.              I don't count Fortran0, as I believe Knuth named an early description       before the first Fortran compiler was written.              It is somewhat convenient to adapt the language when you find parts       harder to implement than was thought. PL/I mostly didn't do that.       [COBOL, Algol60 and 68, Ada. Maybe Pascal? -John]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca