Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 786 of 2,753    |
|    Paolo Bonzini to All    |
|    Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History     |
|    12 Sep 06 19:00:20    |
   
   From: bonzini@gnu.org   
      
   > During the whole   
   > 1980s, our professors at University made their disregard for C public   
   > ("C is only a portable assembler"). Modula 2 was the language of the   
   > 1980s (at least here in Europe).   
      
   Indeed, when I started university in Italy (1998), Modula-2 was still   
   taught as your "first programming language". C was not disregarded as   
   a portable assembler, but it was indeed taught as a "dirty" language   
   and only introduced in the second year.   
      
   > The one single reason that I saw (at that   
   > time) was Microsoft choosing C and not Pascal as the language they   
   > used to re-write MS-DOS 3.x (which was implemented in 8086 assembler   
   > until then).   
      
   They had been using C for Windows since 1985 (while Mac OS was   
   Pascal-based, IIRC).   
      
   Paolo   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca