From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de   
      
   the.real.doctor.zoidberg@gmail.com wrote:   
   > Why isn't Compile-Time-Garbage-Collection feasible?  Consider a Java   
   > compiler which produces assembly code for a specific target instead of   
   > Java's bytecode cenario. The objective is to use Java without the need   
   > for a GC or VM.   
      
   Java sucks nearly every time.   
      
   GC not always.   
      
   Why do you want to avoid GC?   
      
   If you want a language that has GC but nevertheless   
   is performant, use OCaml. :)   
      
   http://www.ocaml-tutorial.org/garbage_collection   
      
   Ciao,   
       Oliver   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)