Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 833 of 2,753    |
|    Hans-Peter Diettrich to fermineutron    |
|    Re: Languages of multiple abstaction    |
|    01 Nov 06 00:53:12    |
      From: DrDiettrich1@aol.com              fermineutron wrote:              > It is generally the belief that high level languages are slower than       > the low level languages.              IMO this depends not only on the purpose of the code, but also on the       environment. Like with different algorithms (for sorting...), the same       code can behave differently, depending on the data etc.              HLL code can have a better performance, when recompiled with a new       compiler, or for new hardware.              I'd say that carefully optimized LLL code will not run slower than HLL       code. Everything else depends... ;-)              DoDi              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca