Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 927 of 2,753    |
|    glen herrmannsfeldt to Hans-Peter Diettrich    |
|    Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted    |
|    11 Apr 07 23:35:05    |
      From: gah@ugcs.caltech.edu              Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:       (snip)              > Right, John. AFAIR COM programs are restricted to the small memory       > model, where everything resides in a single 64K segment. The segment       > registers usually are left unchanged during execution, just as in the 32       > bit flat model.              As far as I know, COM programs aren't restricted to 64K, but       there is no DOS support for more. If they use more, the program       must do all the management needed. Also, I believe that at       least the later versions of DOS and most Windows will load EXE       files with a COM extension. That was done for FORMAT, for       example.              -- glen       [That agrees with my recollection, but this is getting far afield of       compilers. -John]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca