Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 928 of 2,753    |
|    glen herrmannsfeldt to Jon Forrest    |
|    Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed    |
|    13 Apr 07 01:30:26    |
      From: gah@ugcs.caltech.edu              Jon Forrest wrote:       (snip)              > "One thing I've noticed about 64-bit computing in general is that it's       > being oversold. The **only** reason for running in 64-bit mode is if       > you need the additional address space.       (snip)              There is probably some demand for 64 bit integer arithmetic,       though likely much smaller than for large address space.       Addition and subtraction are not hard to do on 32 bit machines,       but multiply and divide are significantly harder.              If intel had done things rights so that one could use the 36       bit physical address of its processors, it would be a few more       years before 64 bit was needed.              But the prices are low enough that it is hard to argue against.       I bought an Athlon 64 processor and motherboard about two years       ago for less than $200. I am sure it would be even less today.              -- glen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca