Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 943 of 2,753    |
|    Jon Harrop to Jon Forrest    |
|    Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed    |
|    28 Apr 07 23:28:16    |
      From: jon@ffconsultancy.com              Jon Forrest wrote:       > Let's say you're a Linux user who never needs to run programs that       > don't fit in 32-bits. Would you run a 32-bit or a 64-bit version of       > Linux?              64 bit for me. I have found that both g++ and the OCaml compilers       produce much faster code for my kind of work under 64 bit. This is       typified by my ray tracer language comparison:               http://www.ffconsultancy.com/languages/ray_tracer/              --       Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy       The F#.NET Journal       http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/fsharp_journal/?usenet              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca