Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 946 of 2,753    |
|    Hans-Peter Diettrich to George Neuner    |
|    Re: Java compiler courses    |
|    29 Apr 07 09:15:48    |
      From: DrDiettrich1@aol.com              George Neuner wrote:              >>IMO an understanding, of how compilers work, is a must for code       >>writers.       >       >       > I agree with you and I happen to have a compiler specific education,       > but in practice all a performance developer needs is to understand how       > her particular compiler translates a particular program construct.              This is just *not* what I meant. IMO it's much easier to understand       e.g. how to write recursive procedures, when one has an idea of how       procedure calls (parameters, stackframes...) are translated into       machine code. Visibility rules for symbols, the difference between       static and dynamic initialization of variables, error messages, and       much more can be understood easier, when having an idea of how a       compiler works in general.              DoDi              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca