Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.ms-sqlserver    |    Notorious Rube Goldberg contraption    |    19,505 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,618 of 19,505    |
|    Erland Sommarskog to imani_technology_spam@yahoo.com    |
|    Re: Clustering on SQL Server 2008    |
|    12 Aug 09 21:30:50    |
      84b78e2c       From: esquel@sommarskog.se              imani_technology_spam@yahoo.com (imani_technology_spam@yahoo.com) writes:       > Thank you for your response. Let me elaborate further. My clients       > have used Oracle and DB2 in the past. Both platforms allow       > scalability through non-failover clustering. In other words, they are       > able to spread one database over several boxes. Can SQL Server 2008       > do something similar? Maybe Microsoft uses a different phrase for       > this functionality.              OK, you want the RAC thing? No, SQL Server does not have this, save for       a feature known as distributed partitioned views. That is, you can define       a view that is spread out on several machines, and SQL Server will only       access the machine(s) that your query hits. I don't think this feature       that very many use, and it is probably difficult to get right.                     --       Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se              Links for SQL Server Books Online:       SQL 2008: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/cc514207.aspx       SQL 2005: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/bb895970.aspx       SQL 2000: http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca