Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.ms-sqlserver    |    Notorious Rube Goldberg contraption    |    19,505 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,119 of 19,505    |
|    ES to All    |
|    Driver JDBC and Sql Server browser    |
|    14 Feb 11 12:58:12    |
      From: emacpi@NOSPAMyahoo.it              Hi,       I've searched for an answer for hours so this newsgruoup is my last chance.              A Java Application uses a JDBC driver without port specification.       Something like              jdbc:sqlserver://localhost;instanceName=instance1 [..]              instance1 is a named instance in a two-nodes cluster active-active with       a different port than default, for example 3234.       In this case the last connection string dosn't work, BUT if I try       something like              jdbc:sqlserver://localhost;instanceName=instance1:3234 it works.              Now, I don't understand. Sql Server Browser is up and running, and       I know that it have to provide these informations like port number and       istance name. So, what about this behaviour ? Do I really need port       number anyway ?              Thanks in advance for your help              Bye              ES              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca