Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.ms-sqlserver    |    Notorious Rube Goldberg contraption    |    19,505 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,856 of 19,505    |
|    contracer to rja.ca...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Opening a sql server DB backup in my    |
|    17 Apr 13 07:12:43    |
      From: contracer11@gmail.com              On Friday, April 12, 2013 11:06:08 AM UTC-3, rja.ca...@gmail.com wrote:       > On Friday, 12 April 2013 11:53:51 UTC+1, Erland Sommarskog wrote:       >       > > contracer (contracer11@gmail.com) writes:       >       > > > I'm looking for any way to open a SQL server DB backup in my home's       >       > > > computer.       >       > > > This DB .bak file haves 12GB , so I think this DB will have about 60GB       >       > > > when opened.       >       > > > I got this DB backup file from my work, and my intention is study       >       > > > queries in my home.       >       > > > I installed SSMS 2012 , but when I try open this DB I get a message       >       > > > that I only can open 10GB db backup file.       >       > >       >       > > It sounds as if you have installed the Express Edition at home, and Express       >       > > is limited to 10 GB databases.       >       > >       >       > > Since this is not likely to be production, get a license of Developer       >       > > Edition. It's 50 USD or less.       >       >       >       > Or of course just make a smaller database with less data in; however, that       will not be a fully reliable model of the database at work - which matters       >       > if you're trying to find ways to improve performance on the work server.       >       > If you're using it just to practise and educate yourself, it's probably OK,       >       > and, most of the work that you do on such a database at home /will/ be       >       > valid when transferred to to the big, "production" server.       >       >       >       > It's not for us to say whether you should take a real database home from       >       > work - but I wouldn't do that.       >       >       >       > If it's 60 GB in size then that is the factor that you'd have to get       >       > down to 10 GB. Persuading a database file to shrink in size after       >       > deleting data may be not straightforward. It also is discouraged in       >       > real data processing, because it leads to issues such as "fragmentation".       >       >       >       > Possibly you could copy the data into six or seven databases, each       >       > 10 GB, but I don't know if that's going to help you work around       >       > the Express limitations. For testing queries, I don't know whether       >       > a database for your home system in which some of the objects are       >       > synonyms or views of tables in other databases will be significantly       >       > different - or whether it'll work at all. But I think it'll make a       >       > difference e.g. in foreign key relationships. But, would you learn more?       >       > Probably not.       >       >       >       > Certainly, using the Developer Edition will be the easier answer.       >       > But fifty bucks is fifty bucks.              Thanks a lot for all answers.       I just bought this:       http://www.ebay.com/itm/Microsoft-SQL-Server-2012-Developer-Edit       on-Retail-Box-/181071524571?pt=AU_software&hash=item2a28b432db              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca