Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.ms-sqlserver    |    Notorious Rube Goldberg contraption    |    19,505 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,215 of 19,505    |
|    Erland Sommarskog to M.G.    |
|    Re: cluster or hash table advise needed    |
|    29 Sep 15 22:15:16    |
      From: esquel@sommarskog.se              M.G. (michael@gurfinkel.us) writes:       > We are designing a table with high insert / delete activity. The table       > maintains sequence of actions per specific experiments. These are the       > attributes:              Important question: is the activity concurrent or not? That is, can data for       multiple experiments be written simultaneously?              > Expected number of records - around 10 million, expected number of       > inserts (pure additions) around 5000 a day, number of change       > (delete/insert) around 1000              OK, so that is not really high activity. :-)              And then I would assume that there is no concurrent activity.              I would say that you scrap the ACTIVITY_SEQUENCE column, as it seems       to serve no purpose. Make (EXP_ID, ACT_SEQ, ACT_ID) a primary key, because       a having a primary key based on data is a good thing. You may never       look at indivitual data, but you don't want duplicates. And make       this PK clustered, that seems to fit your use of the table very well.                                   --       Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, esquel@sommarskog.se              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca