home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.databases.ms-sqlserver      Notorious Rube Goldberg contraption      19,505 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 19,215 of 19,505   
   Erland Sommarskog to M.G.   
   Re: cluster or hash table advise needed   
   29 Sep 15 22:15:16   
   
   From: esquel@sommarskog.se   
      
   M.G. (michael@gurfinkel.us) writes:   
   > We are designing a table with high insert / delete activity. The table   
   > maintains sequence of actions per specific experiments. These are the   
   > attributes:   
      
   Important question: is the activity concurrent or not? That is, can data for   
   multiple experiments be written simultaneously?   
      
   > Expected number of records - around 10 million, expected number of   
   > inserts (pure additions) around 5000 a day, number of change   
   > (delete/insert) around 1000   
      
   OK, so that is not really high activity. :-)   
      
   And then I would assume that there is no concurrent activity.   
      
   I would say that you scrap the ACTIVITY_SEQUENCE column, as it seems   
   to serve no purpose. Make (EXP_ID, ACT_SEQ, ACT_ID) a primary key, because   
   a having a primary key based on data is a good thing. You may never   
   look at indivitual data, but you don't want duplicates. And make   
   this PK clustered, that seems to fit your use of the table very well.   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, esquel@sommarskog.se   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca