Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,179 of 2,288    |
|    .com to Mark D Powell    |
|    Re: how many tablespaces    |
|    04 Mar 04 12:08:24    |
   
   From: mcstockX@Xenquery   
      
   "Mark D Powell" wrote in message   
   news:2687bb95.0403040733.54e2e330@posting.google.com...   
   | "Jim Kennedy" wrote in message   
   news:...   
   | > "Vissu" wrote in message   
   | > news:2bedd6a7.0403032012.2899a4a6@posting.google.com...   
   | > > Hi ,   
   | > >   
   | > > We will have about 50 tables. Some tables will be huge (severel   
   | > > million rows) and some are small but most of them will have about a   
   | > > million rows. For best performance of the database, how many   
   | > > tablespace should I have. I was thinking of using Locally Managed   
   | > > tablespaces (uniform extents) for both data and indexes.   
   | > >   
   | > > Can anyone share some experiences? Any other tips on layout of the   
   | > > database will be appreciated. Thanks   
   | > >   
   | > > Vissu   
   | > What version? Use locally managed with auto managed extents and put the   
   | > data all in one tablespace.   
   | > Jim   
   |   
   | How many tablespaces you should use to support your database depends   
   | on the expected size and number of your objects and the organization   
   | of your disk farm.   
   |   
   | I greatly favor organizing most applications into large and small   
   | object tablespaces. Generally two sizes will work for everything.   
   | The best sizes depend on the objects involved.   
   |   
   | I do not like autoallocate because it still can suffer from the free   
   | space fragmentation problem while a properly sized uniform extent   
   | tablespace will never suffer this problem. The only time I think   
   | autoallocate is useful is where you install a canned package and the   
   | vendor places everything into a single tablespace (usually the   
   | application owner default tablespace).   
   |   
   | It all comes down to judgment on which arrangement will provide the   
   | most effective managment options.   
   |   
   | IMHO -- Mark D Powell --   
      
   also should take into consideration grouping segments for similar   
   availability / back-up schedules / transportability / read-only and similar   
   tablespace-specific operations   
      
   -{ mcs   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca