Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,362 of 2,288    |
|    John C. Bollinger to Pandis Ippokratis    |
|    Re: Reestablishing a db connection after    |
|    29 Apr 04 08:45:38    |
      XPost: comp.lang.java.databases, comp.lang.java.programmer       From: jobollin@indiana.edu              Followups directed to comp.lang.java.programmer.                     Pandis Ippokratis wrote:              > I have the following problem: I am implementing a server in Java and       > I use jdbc to connect to an Oracle 9.0.2 db. All seem to work fine,       > but when I intensionally cause a network failure (i.e. I remove the       > network cable) I get the following exception:       >       > java.sql.SQLException: Io exception: Connection reset by peer: socket       > write error       >       > I plug the cable again and I want to reset the java.sql.Connection but       > this seems to not work. Any suggestions?              There may be an option you can use when you set up the connection that       will instruct the driver to attempt to reconnect automatically. The       details and implications should be considered carefully. The MySQL JDBC       driver distributed by MySQL has such a feature, although I'm not sure       whether it handles all cases of connection interruption.              Alternatively, you can wrap the Connection provided by your driver in an       object that handles the details of this scenario, which might include       obtaining a new Connection to replace the interrupted one. If you make       this new object implement Connection itself (and delegate to the       internal collection) then it would be a drop-in replacement. You must       again be careful to consider all the implications, however. For       instance, there are various aspects of DB-side state that are tied to       specific connections; in particular, transactions. There are also       Java-side entities that are tied to specific Connections and would       require considerable additional work to support transparently -- most       particularly Statements and ResultSets.              The best choice may be to better isolate the DB interactions from the       rest of your code so that you can handle exceptions in a sensible way       but in a single place. Implement the Data Access Object pattern, for       instance, and make your data access objects sufficiently smart. If you       need to do so then put a facade around more complicated DB access       activity that knows how to deal with these problems (and others). This       could all be implemented with EJB, which would have some advantages, but       could also be implemented in normal Java code.                     John Bollinger       jobollin@indiana.edu              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca