Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,438 of 2,288    |
|    James to All    |
|    data integrity problem of Oracle 8.1.6 S    |
|    24 May 04 23:57:22    |
      From: cheungchung@hotmail.com              Hi ,               I have an oracle 8.1.6 running on solaris platform. This database have a       standby DB of same version and OS platform for query or report generation.       At day time the standby DB is in read-only mode and the archived logs are       applied at night.              Last week, this production DB have a maintenance and added 4 datafiles to       different tablespaces and this physical changes have been re-structed at the       standby DB also. The standby DB have been successfully recovered through the       archived logs and I can turn back it to read only mode the next for users to       query.              However, this week some users complained that their query report return "no       rows selected" for selecting the column A ( which is a unix timestamp) on a       table named SERVICE . Then I checked it with simple query like below:              select columnB from SERVICE where columnA = 10283848;                     Table : SERVICE        columnA NUMBER(38)        columnB NUMBER(38)        columnC VARCHAR2(255)        columnD NUMBER(38)        columnE NUMBER(38)        columnF NUMBER(38)        columnG NUMBER(38)                     It returned " no rows selected" ONLY if the timestamp number ( columnA ) I       choosed was after the day of prod DB maintenance. And I found that not only       columnA , but also all the columns with datatype NUMBER(38) got this problem              If I tried the SQL like this :       select columnB from SERVICE where columnA like '10283848'; or apply       'tochar' on columnA              It will returned the rows I needed !!              The total number of rows of this table is the same as the one in production       DB              Can anyone help to give some hint to troubleshoot what's happening in this       table ?              Thanks in advance                     James              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca