Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,535 of 2,288    |
|    Hans Forbrich to Sporge    |
|    Re: Devoloper licenses    |
|    29 Jun 04 22:59:08    |
      From: forbrich@yahoo.net              Sporge wrote:              >       > My question is, since we do not use any of the products internally       > (other than during testing, no production data used) does this mean       > that we do not need any licenses?       >              Why do you insist on asking here? The only way to get an answer that is       legally binding is to ask Oracle.                     Think for a moment:does someone (anyone) have any benefit that might be       translated into a $ value - time saved in production, less downtime, faster       user response resulting in less idle time? If the answer is yes, then       Oracle wants (and deserves) their share of that benefit.              Another way to evaluate: if Oracle asked you to remove all their products       for 30 days, would there be any impact on your revenue?              In your shop, I see a potential benefit is the ability to generate a revenue       stream by coding for others.              Oracle's free licenses specifically state 'for development purposes only'.       No commercial training, no testing, no evaluation - development only. And       that, only until a financial benefit is realized through operational       assistance to the company or revenue stream.              I don't see anything confusing about that.              /Hans              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca