Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,646 of 2,288    |
|    Frank van Bortel to Christian Eriksson    |
|    Re: Understanding "lsnrctl status"    |
|    17 Aug 04 11:40:37    |
      From: fvanbortel@netscape.net              Christian Eriksson wrote:              > Mark.Powell@eds.com (Mark D Powell) wrote in message news:<268       bb95.0408161222.78040733@posting.google.com>...       >       >>c-eriks@algonet.se (Christian Eriksson) wrote in message news:       d0d6f67c.0408160550.51f075ab@posting.google.com>...       >>       >>>Hi!       >>>       >>>I want to clarify, for myself, some basic facts about Oracle Client       >>>Server configuration. I start with the listener configuration on the       >>>server side.       >>>       >>>What block(s) in what configuration file(s) defines the services       >>>(shown below)?       >>>       >>>What causes there to be more than one instance of a service (shown       >>>below)?       >>>       >>>Output from "lsnrctl status" (Oracle 9.2.0.1.0 on Sun Solaris 8):       >>>       >>>........................       >>>       >>>Services Summary...       >>>Service "PLSExtProc" has 1 instance(s).       >>> Instance "PLSExtProc", status UNKNOWN, has 1 handler(s) for this       >>>service...       >>>Service "ftgdb" has 2 instance(s).       >>> Instance "ftgdb", status UNKNOWN, has 1 handler(s) for this       >>>service...       >>> Instance "ftgdb", status READY, has 1 handler(s) for this service...       >>>Service "ftgdbXDB" has 1 instance(s).       >>> Instance "ftgdb", status READY, has 1 handler(s) for this service...       >>>The command completed successfully       >>>       >>>Regards Christian Eriksson       >>       >>Starting with version 8.1 the Oracle instance and the listener have       >>the ability to automatically find each other without listener.ora       >>entries being predefinded for the database. Most listener.ora files       >>however would have had SID_DESC entries for the existing databases in       >>them since these were requried up to then. Habit, would result in       >>entries being made for new databases.       >>       >>I believe this is the cause of the double listing for a database       >>instance via status. Unfortunately I am not allowed to change the       >>listener.ora and test if removing the now redundant entries and       >>bouncing the listener and databases 1- works correctly and 2- cleans       >>up the status enties.       >>       >>As noted this is conjecture, but perhaps you can test it and post back       >>the results.       >>       >>HTH -- Mark D Powell --       >       >       > Thank's for the answer!       >       > I still can't pinpoint where the services are defined. In the       > listener.ora file I can see the following for the LISTENER listener:       >       > SID_LIST_LISTENER =       > (SID_LIST =       > (SID_DESC =       > (SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)       > (ORACLE_HOME = /opt/oracle/product/9.2.0.1.0)       > (PROGRAM = extproc)       > )       > (SID_DESC =       > (GLOBAL_DBNAME = ftgdb)       > (ORACLE_HOME = /opt/oracle/product/9.2.0.1.0)       > (SID_NAME = ftgdb)       > )       >       > I guess the SID_NAME entries in the two SID_DESC blocks defines the       > services "PLSExtProc" and "ftgdb". My wondering is about the service       > "ftgdbXDB". Can someone tell me where that service might be defined?       >       > Regards Christian Eriksson              See pfile - there's a Mutli-threaded Server for XDB defined.       Try http://localhost:8080 and you should get a log on screen.       --              Regards,       Frank van Bortel              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca