Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,665 of 2,288    |
|    Larry to Mike    |
|    Re: db2 vs oracle    |
|    26 Aug 04 00:18:15    |
      XPost: comp.databases.ibm-db2       From: Larry@nospam.net              OK ... so you cross-post to comp.databases.ibm-db2 and       comp.databases.oracle with a subject line of "db2 vs. Oracle", and then       you request no flame wars? I won't hold my breath!              At the SQL level (as you put it), DB2 employs ANSI SQL ... and is the       only RDMBS vendor to employ a stored procedure language that complies       with ANSI's PSM standard.              Larry              Mike wrote:       > No flame wars, please!       >       > We're planning a move from a non-relational system to       > a relational system. Our choices have been narrowed to       > Oracle and DB2. Since we're moving from non-relational       > to relational, then we're not currently using any       > relational-type operators. So I expect the end result to       > use simple, SQL standard commands and queries.       >       > The question: At the SQL standard level is there any       > appreciable difference between Oracle and DB2.       >       > Example: I know that Oracle has cascading deletes. We're       > not using them now so I don't expect to use them with the       > new system.       >       > Thanks.       >       > Mike              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca