home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.databases.oracle      Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT      2,288 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,665 of 2,288   
   Larry to Mike   
   Re: db2 vs oracle   
   26 Aug 04 00:18:15   
   
   XPost: comp.databases.ibm-db2   
   From: Larry@nospam.net   
      
   OK ... so you cross-post to comp.databases.ibm-db2 and   
   comp.databases.oracle with a subject line of "db2 vs. Oracle", and then   
   you request no flame wars? I won't hold my breath!   
      
   At the SQL level (as you put it), DB2 employs ANSI SQL ... and is the   
   only RDMBS vendor to employ a stored procedure language that complies   
   with ANSI's PSM standard.   
      
   Larry   
      
   Mike wrote:   
   > No flame wars, please!   
   >   
   > We're planning a move from a non-relational system to   
   > a relational system. Our choices have been narrowed to   
   > Oracle and DB2. Since we're moving from non-relational   
   > to relational, then we're not currently using any   
   > relational-type operators. So I expect the end result to   
   > use simple, SQL standard commands and queries.   
   >   
   > The question: At the SQL standard level is there any   
   > appreciable difference between Oracle and DB2.   
   >   
   > Example: I know that Oracle has cascading deletes. We're   
   > not using them now so I don't expect to use them with the   
   > new system.   
   >   
   > Thanks.   
   >   
   > Mike   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca