Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,861 of 2,288    |
|    Serge Rielau to All    |
|    Re: Comparison of DB2 and Oracle?    |
|    21 Oct 04 09:25:44    |
      XPost: comp.databases.ibm-db2       From: srielau@ca.ibm.com              OK, here is the deal:       When you execute a dynamic statement which depends on table T.       DB2 will hold a usage lock on T until the end of the transaction.       So noone will be able to alter T (in a non-trivial way) until this       transaction is over.       An alternate design would be to release the lock after usage.       However in the interest of keeping the cache fast the capturing of locks       needs to be minimized. Schema evolution is considered a much rarer (more       rare??) event than cache-hits              Does that answer the comment?              Cheers       Serge              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca