Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 373 of 2,288    |
|    Larry Edelstein to Neil Truby    |
|    Re: Company thought DB2 will be better t    |
|    13 Sep 03 14:32:41    |
      XPost: comp.databases.informix, comp.databases, comp.databases.ibm-db2       From: lsedels@us.ibm.com              Binding is done to support a feature called Static/Embedded SQL. Static       SQL is suitable for situations where the SQL is somewhat predictable.       You develop the SQL as part of the application code and "embed" it into       the application so to speak. Then, you precompile, compile, link edit,       and BIND the SQL into what is called a package (which essentially is a       Load module). The package is an executable ... and when invoked, no       compilation or bind is necessary ... therefore, the performance tends to       be significantly better than dynamic SQL.              Larry Edelstein              Neil Truby wrote:              > > Larry Edelstein       > >       > > Neil Truby wrote:       >       > > > You forgot to mention that lovely old IBM tradition, BINDing.       > > "Larry Edelstein" |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca