home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.databases.oracle      Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT      2,288 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 381 of 2,288   
   Larry Edelstein to Daniel Morgan   
   Re: Company thought DB2 will be better t   
   13 Sep 03 21:54:24   
   
   XPost: comp.databases.informix, comp.databases, comp.databases.ibm-db2   
   From: lsedels@us.ibm.com   
      
   Daniel,   
      
   You are right about the flame war (although somehow I don't think we've seen   
   the   
   last of this one yet :-)). But let me tell you one thing: I may not be the most   
   eloquent  at describing the flaws or drawbacks of Oracle, but for you to take   
   potshots at DB2 (many of which weren't even valid) and then pretend that   
   Oracle has   
   no drawbacks or flaws is insulting.   
      
   Larry Edelstein   
      
   Daniel Morgan wrote:   
      
   > Larry Edelstein wrote:   
   >   
   > >Jim,   
   > >   
   > >I can't answer your assertion to this level of detail ... I'll leave that to   
   > >someone else from the lab who knows more about the DB2 concurrency model. I   
   can   
   > >tell you that   
   > >   
   > >- I'm not sure that this is accurate ... "turns dynamic SQL into static   
   SQL"?   
   > >- even if it is, you are talking about an experience on DB2/MVS from years   
   ago   
   > >- there are drawbacks about Oracle's concurrency model also. I believe that   
   the   
   > >lock status is maintained on each data block potentially requiring disk   
   access   
   > >in certain cases.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > Speculating about the properties of a product you are not that familiar   
   > with is like trying to jog across quick sand. While   
   > I have worked extensively with DB2 it was some years ago so I try to   
   > step gingerly when discussing specifics. But to   
   > address your statement ... Oracle doesn't lock blocks. Period. You   
   > couldn't do it if you tried. And with Oracle dropping   
   > rollback segments in favor of undo almost all of the traditional   
   > concerns are gone. I haven't seen an ORA-01555 in more   
   > than a year. And that's in development. Haven't seen one in production   
   > on a 9i server since its release.   
   >   
   > I do think we should be careful that what started out as one thing has   
   > the potential to turn into a flame war. I'd suggest   
   > everyone remember this are tools not religions, take a deep breath, and   
   > step back form the abyss. Lets be sure to keep   
   > this discussion professional.   
   >   
   > --   
   > Daniel Morgan   
   > http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp   
   > http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp   
   > damorgan@x.washington.edu   
   > (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca