Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 381 of 2,288    |
|    Larry Edelstein to Daniel Morgan    |
|    Re: Company thought DB2 will be better t    |
|    13 Sep 03 21:54:24    |
      XPost: comp.databases.informix, comp.databases, comp.databases.ibm-db2       From: lsedels@us.ibm.com              Daniel,              You are right about the flame war (although somehow I don't think we've seen       the       last of this one yet :-)). But let me tell you one thing: I may not be the most       eloquent at describing the flaws or drawbacks of Oracle, but for you to take       potshots at DB2 (many of which weren't even valid) and then pretend that       Oracle has       no drawbacks or flaws is insulting.              Larry Edelstein              Daniel Morgan wrote:              > Larry Edelstein wrote:       >       > >Jim,       > >       > >I can't answer your assertion to this level of detail ... I'll leave that to       > >someone else from the lab who knows more about the DB2 concurrency model. I       can       > >tell you that       > >       > >- I'm not sure that this is accurate ... "turns dynamic SQL into static       SQL"?       > >- even if it is, you are talking about an experience on DB2/MVS from years       ago       > >- there are drawbacks about Oracle's concurrency model also. I believe that       the       > >lock status is maintained on each data block potentially requiring disk       access       > >in certain cases.       > >       > > |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca